Zafar Iqbal
The government’s decision to close down the Utility Stores Corporation (USC) is a decisive step in addressing inefficiency, waste, and mismanagement in Pakistan’s public sector. The closure of this long-standing institution, which was originally designed to provide subsidized goods to the underprivileged, marks an important turning point in the nation’s approach to governance and public sector reform. While some may argue that the USC’s demise leaves the poor without a safety net, a closer examination reveals that the corporation has failed to deliver on its promises for years. Instead of serving as a lifeline for the marginalized, USC has become a symbol of inefficiency, corruption, and taxpayer-funded waste.
The Utility Stores Corporation was intended to provide subsidized essential goods to lower-income groups, especially during times of economic stress. However, over the years, USC has not only failed to fulfill its mandate but also become a burden on the taxpayer. Despite the billions of rupees allocated annually to sustain the corporation, it has consistently underperformed. For instance, just recently, the Economic Coordination Committee (ECC) approved Rs 1.7 billion to settle pending liabilities under the Prime Minister’s Relief Package, highlighting the dire financial situation of the USC. These figures reveal the inefficiencies inherent in the operation of such a large public sector institution.
Reports of corruption, pilferage, and a lack of proper supply chains have consistently plagued the USC. Despite these glaring issues, the organization continued to receive government funding year after year. This allocation of public funds raises important questions about accountability and the effectiveness of public institutions. If an entity cannot fulfill its core purpose, it should not be propped up at the taxpayer’s expense. The closure of USC sends a powerful message that public institutions must meet expectations and deliver tangible results, or they will face consequences.
The central argument in defense of the USC’s closure lies in questioning whether it ever truly served the people it was meant to help. Critics of the move might contend that the dissolution of the corporation will leave the underprivileged without access to subsidized goods. However, this perspective ignores the fact that the USC’s operations have been far from efficient. The corporation was often plagued by logistical challenges, inconsistent supplies, and substandard products, which undermined its effectiveness. In this sense, the USC failed to deliver on its promise of providing relief to the poor.
In contrast, alternatives to the USC model could prove to be more effective. A more viable option might lie in revisiting historical models like the ration card system that was in place before the partition of India and Pakistan. This system, which continues to operate in India, allowed individuals to buy essential goods at licensed ration shops based on the number of people registered under their ration cards. The system was efficient, cost-effective, and operated through the private sector at the retail level. The government at the time believed that Pakistan had outgrown such a model, opting for a more centralized public sector solution in the form of USC. However, this shift only resulted in greater inefficiency and a heavier financial burden on taxpayers.
This historical comparison underscores the fact that Pakistan’s previous experience with rationing was far more effective than the USC model. Rather than relying on a bloated public sector entity, Pakistan could look to more flexible, decentralized, and market-driven models to ensure that subsidized goods reach the people who need them most. The USC’s closure provides an opportunity for the government to explore these alternatives and adopt solutions that are better suited to today’s economic realities.
While the closure of the USC is a necessary step, it comes with human costs. Thousands of employees working within the corporation stand to be directly affected by the shutdown. Transitioning these workers to other roles or sectors will require careful planning and intervention. The government must ensure that displaced workers are given support in the form of retraining programs, severance packages, or alternative employment opportunities. If the government fails to address these issues adequately, the decision to close USC could further exacerbate unemployment and social unrest, particularly in communities that have relied on the corporation for jobs.
Additionally, many low-income communities, particularly those in rural areas, depend on USC outlets for access to affordable goods. The government must quickly develop alternative mechanisms to ensure that these communities do not face disruptions in accessing essential products. This could involve expanding existing private-sector initiatives, ensuring that rationing systems or discount programs are implemented to fill the gap left by the USC. The government must act swiftly to mitigate any negative impact on vulnerable populations, ensuring that the poorest citizens are not left without support.
Pl watch the video and subscribe to the YouTube channel of republicpolicy.com for quality podcasts:
The closure of the USC could serve as a precedent for further evaluation and reform of other underperforming public sector entities in Pakistan. The move signals that the government is serious about holding public institutions accountable and ensuring that taxpayer money is spent efficiently. In a country that faces severe fiscal constraints, there is little room for inefficiency or waste in the public sector. If other institutions fail to deliver results, they too should face scrutiny and potential closure.
Pakistan’s government needs to assess its public sector with a critical eye, focusing on institutions that truly serve the public and contribute to the country’s economic development. What does not deliver results should not be allowed to continue operating indefinitely. The government must be willing to make hard decisions, even if they are politically unpopular, in order to improve governance and create a more sustainable economic model.
Ultimately, the closure of the Utility Stores Corporation is a step in the right direction for Pakistan. It demonstrates a commitment to accountability, efficiency, and better governance. While the immediate effects of this decision may be felt by employees and communities reliant on USC, the long-term benefits of improving public sector performance outweigh these costs. The government’s responsibility is to ensure that every rupee spent advances the welfare of the people, and that means eliminating wasteful and ineffective institutions.
By closing down the USC, Pakistan has taken an important step toward a more efficient, accountable, and sustainable public sector. Hopefully, this decision will serve as the catalyst for broader reforms that address other underperforming government entities, ultimately leading to a more effective and responsive state that is better equipped to serve the needs of its citizens.
