Editorial
In Pakistan’s constitutional framework, the authority to amend the Constitution rests exclusively with Parliament. This principle is not only central to the spirit of democracy but also ensures constitutional supremacy. Yet, today a pressing question emerges: can a Parliament whose very mandate remains under dispute legitimately alter the nation’s supreme law?
Follow Republic Policy Website
The current legislature faces severe credibility challenges. Allegations of electoral manipulation continue to surround its formation, while hundreds of election petitions remain unresolved in tribunals. This persistent uncertainty strengthens the perception that the present Parliament does not genuinely reflect the will of the people. If such a contested assembly pushes through constitutional amendments, it risks damaging both the integrity of the Constitution and the foundations of democracy itself.
Follow Republic Policy YouTube
The true purpose of constitutional amendments should be to improve governance, strengthen citizen rights, and modernize state institutions in line with contemporary needs. However, if the amendment process is dominated by a forum lacking public confidence, the danger arises that such changes may serve narrow political or vested interests rather than the collective good. This would only empower unaccountable groups and deepen the imbalance of power within the system.
Follow Republic Policy Twitter
For Republic Policy, constitutional reform is a sacred responsibility. It should only be exercised by a Parliament that is unquestionably representative, emerging from transparent elections and free from questions about its legitimacy. Constitution-making is about shaping the future of the state and society; any attempt to proceed under artificial or compromised representation risks creating an enduring constitutional and democratic crisis.
Follow Republic Policy Facebook
At this crucial moment, Pakistan must ensure that constitutional processes remain subject to public trust. This means constitutional amendments should be deferred until electoral disputes are resolved and Parliament enjoys a clear, undisputed mandate. Such prudence will not only preserve the sanctity of the Constitution but also secure the long-term stability of Pakistan’s democratic system.
