Mudassir Rizwan
Functional international foreign policy in disputed areas is characterized by a pragmatic and holistic approach that prioritizes diplomacy, conflict resolution, and long-term stability. It involves a deep understanding of the historical, cultural, and geopolitical complexities of the region, as well as a commitment to engaging with all relevant stakeholders.
A quality foreign policy in disputed areas seeks to de-escalate tensions, prevent further conflict, and promote dialogue and negotiation. It also involves supporting democratic processes, human rights, and the rule of law, while respecting the sovereignty and territorial integrity of all nations involved.
Moreover, an effective foreign policy takes into account the interests and concerns of all parties involved, and works towards finding mutually acceptable solutions. It also recognizes the importance of international cooperation and multilateralism in addressing complex disputes, and aims to build consensus and coalitions to address the root causes of conflict.
Overall, a functional international foreign policy in disputed areas requires a balanced and nuanced approach that is focused on sustainable peace, security, and prosperity for all affected populations.
Amid Israel’s amplified strategic moves against Iran, it’s crucial to acknowledge that this situation extends beyond the apparent conflict with Hamas in Gaza. Contrary to oversimplified views, there are intricate dynamics in play. Hamas’s political goals and Iran’s broader geopolitical ambitions have intertwined them in a shared alignment against Israel, unveiling a more intricate and complex conflict. This transcends the immediate tensions in Gaza, emphasizing the implications of decades of ineffective U.S. foreign policy. This policy failure has facilitated Iran’s ascendancy as a dominant regional power, increasing its boldness with limited restraint.
The United States, once an unparalleled authority in the Middle East, has witnessed a substantial wane in its influence over the past decade. The most glaring manifestation of this decline is the inability of Washington to effectively counter Iran’s expanding regional clout. Since 2010, Iran has extended its influence by funding and arming proxy groups across the Middle East, establishing a network of militias and political entities that challenge U.S. interests and destabilize neighboring nations. This is a severe manifestation of America’s policy failure, permitting Iran to achieve a level of regional dominance previously deemed unthinkable.
Previously, the West incentivized Iran to counter socialism and Sunni nations, with the U.S. predominantly addressing the Iran issue from a standpoint of political interests. However, in the current interconnected international system, where economic concerns often supersede political considerations, Iran discerns more advantages than disadvantages in adopting an aggressive policy against Washington and its regional allies. The escalation of sanctions against Iran from 370 during the Obama administration to over 1,500 during the Trump era has positioned Iran as the most sanctioned country globally. Consequently, the U.S. approach of containment and de-escalation is ill-suited for dealing with a regime committed to a revolutionary foreign policy.
The repercussions of America’s botched Iran policy are reverberating throughout the Middle East. In Yemen, Iran-backed Houthi rebels have not only captured substantial territory but have also targeted Western-flagged ships, exacerbating turmoil in the Red Sea region. Additionally, in Iraq, the U.S. has faltered in addressing the growing power of Iranian-backed Shia militias, who have turned against American forces and assets. These failures signify the collapse of American deterrence in the Middle East, permitting Iran to act with impunity and resulting in minimal consequences for its aggressive actions.
Notably, Russia and China have augmented their presence in the Middle East, collaborating with Iran to challenge Western dominance in the region. Russia has strengthened its ties with Tehran through military, economic, and diplomatic cooperation, most notably in Syria. This collaboration has not only secured Russia’s strategic interests but has also positioned Moscow as a pivotal power broker in the Middle East. Simultaneously, China’s economic-driven approach, mainly through its Belt and Road Initiative, has cemented its foothold in the Middle East. By aligning with Iran, China has solidified its position as a counterbalance to U.S. influence in the region.
The comprehensive debacle of America’s Iran policy necessitates an urgent and critical review. The U.S. must acknowledge its failures, reassess containment strategies, and adopt a more assertive and holistic approach to counter Iran’s ambitions. This change is crucial for achieving long-term stability and peace in the Middle East.
