Special Investigator John Durham, assigned to probe the origins of the Trump-Russia investigation, unveiled a 300-page dossier alleging FBI negligence in launching the inquiry based on ambiguous and insufficient intelligence.
In his comprehensive report, Durham lambasted the FBI for its lack of analytical thoroughness and suggested that senior FBI officials exhibited bias when receiving information from politically affiliated sources. Responding to the allegations, the FBI asserted that corrective measures had already been taken under current leadership to address the identified lapses.
Don’t forget to Subscribe our channel & Press Bell Icon.
Nonetheless, the report, devoid of any successful prosecutions, appeared to serve as a persuasive tool in shaping public sentiment, bolstering assertions made by Trump and his allies regarding the Obama administration’s alleged exploitation of federal authority to influence the 2016 election.
Durham’s findings contradict a 2019 assessment by the Justice Department’s internal watchdog, which concluded that while the FBI committed errors, the decision to initiate the Trump-Russia investigation was warranted and devoid of partisan prejudice.
Subscribe our website for latest updates:
https://republicpolicy.com/shop/
Read More
