Muhammad Zubair Civil Servant
We like to believe our thoughts belong to us. We treat them as private property, shaped by our own reason and owned by our own minds. Yet a great many of the ideas we hold were never built by us at all. They came to us from family, from society, from schooling, from our religious and political loyalties, and from the dominant culture of our age. We accepted them. We began to see the world through them. Slowly, they became part of who we are. Rarely, if ever, do we stop to ask whether what we call free thought is in fact the product of an intellectual system someone else designed.
Modern psychology names one form of this problem the availability bias. We tend to form opinions about the world on the basis of whatever information comes most easily to mind, not on the basis of facts that are more reliable. Today the media and social platforms feed this habit without pause. When a piece of news, an idea or a narrative keeps appearing before us, it begins to dominate our thinking. We start to see it as more important or more common than it really is. Our decisions, then, are not made by reason alone. They are also made by the information that is steadily poured into our minds.
Plato captured this limit of human awareness in his famous allegory of the cave. Prisoners chained inside a cave watch shadows flicker on a wall and take them for reality. They have never seen the objects that cast those shadows. For them, the world presented on the wall is the only world there is. We, too, live in a cave of our own time. The reality that reaches us has already been arranged from a particular angle before we ever lay eyes on it.
Francis Bacon described the prejudices of the human mind as idols. Some false notions, he argued, arise from our nature, some from our upbringing, some from language and social dealings, and some from the systems of thought that prevail in our time. These idols shape our understanding so deeply that we stop seeing things as they are. We see them instead as our earlier assumptions tell us they must be.
Look around and the examples are everywhere. When we attach ourselves to a political leader, we begin to find wisdom in every decision he makes. When we revere a religious or intellectual figure, questioning his views starts to feel almost improper. In the office, the likes and dislikes of the person in authority quietly steer the direction of our reasoning. The company of friends, the expectations of family and the desire for social acceptance all leave their mark on our choices. The striking thing is this: we never notice these influences, yet we keep producing arguments in defence of the positions they gave us.
The same process unfolds on a larger, civilisational scale. The dominant powers of the world do not hold only economic and political sway. Their language, their academic vocabulary, their standards of beauty and their very idea of progress shape the minds of other societies. Sometimes we come to regard our own civilisation as inferior for no good reason. At other times, in rushing to defend it, we deny even its genuine flaws. In both cases our judgement is not the fruit of free reflection. It is a reaction, set off by something outside us.
None of this means that being influenced by others is a fault in itself. We learn language, knowledge and culture from others. Human consciousness does not form in a vacuum. The trouble begins when influence turns into unconscious obedience, when we accept an idea simply because it is the prevailing opinion of our group, our leader or our age.
Here lies a curious contradiction. The more a person trusts his own intelligence, the less he sometimes examines his own biases. He reaches a conclusion first and supplies the reasons afterwards. His intelligence is no longer searching for truth. It is busy defending what he already believes.
Perhaps intellectual freedom does not mean escaping every influence. That is impossible in human life. Freedom begins with awareness. It begins when we see which forces are shaping our thought, and when we measure how far we are able to disagree with them.
So ask yourself the real question. It is not who influences your thinking. It is whether you can admit that even your most cherished belief might be wrong. A mind that cannot question its own certainty may claim to be free. It will never know what freedom feels like.
The best-selling books of Republic Policy Think Tank, including the landmark book The Bureaucratic Coup, are available at Vanguard Books, Liberty Books, Readings, Kitab Sarai, Sang-e-Meel, Saeed Book Bank Islamabad, National Book Foundation, and others across Pakistan. Contact for home delivery: 0300 9552542.
