Zafar Iqbal
Pakistan’s agricultural sector, a cornerstone of the nation’s economy, is currently at a crossroads. The government’s recent moves to corporatize agriculture, including leasing unused state land to corporations and individuals for irrigation and cultivation, have sparked intense debate across the country. While some view this as a much-needed step towards modernization, others fear that it could marginalize small farmers and concentrate power in the hands of a few corporate giants. This shift in agricultural policy has highlighted the delicate balance between embracing corporate farming and protecting the interests of the country’s vast rural population.
Agriculture plays a central role in Pakistan’s economy, with around 70 percent of the population connected to the sector in some capacity, and 37.4 percent directly employed in farming. Despite its critical importance, Pakistan’s agriculture sector has faced persistent challenges: land distribution is highly unequal, farming practices are outdated, and water scarcity remains a significant issue. These challenges have stunted the sector’s growth, leading to inefficiencies, low yields, and food insecurity.
One of the most pressing issues is the concentration of land in the hands of large feudal landlords, a situation that has remained largely unchanged due to the lack of meaningful land reforms. These large landholders often exploit smaller farmers and farm laborers, limiting access to resources, technology, and fair wages. Moreover, the sector is severely under-mechanized, relying on outdated farming practices, such as hand-picking crops, which can result in contaminated yields. The reliance on inefficient flood irrigation further exacerbates water wastage and fails to meet farmers’ needs.
A significant portion of agricultural land in Pakistan, approximately 27 million acres, is cultivated by small farmers working on plots of six acres or less. This results in inefficient land use and limited capacity to adopt modern farming techniques, advanced machinery, or technological innovations. As a result, productivity remains low, and Pakistan’s agricultural output lags behind its potential. Additionally, the country struggles with food security and reduced competitiveness in global markets, making it increasingly essential to modernize the sector.
Given the historical struggles of the agricultural sector, the push toward corporate farming presents a compelling argument for change. Corporate farms, with their larger landholdings and greater financial resources, have the potential to lower per-unit production costs, increase yields, and improve profits through economies of scale. By investing in modern machinery, bulk purchasing, specialized labor, and advanced irrigation practices, corporate farming could lead to significant improvements in agricultural productivity.
Moreover, the influx of investment in infrastructure, technology, and research and development could have a transformative effect on the entire sector. Corporate farms could pave the way for innovations in farming practices, such as drip irrigation, that save water and improve crop yields. Such improvements would not only benefit corporate farms but could also serve as a model for smaller, non-corporate farms, which would be encouraged to adopt modern practices to stay competitive.
Furthermore, corporate farming could help alleviate some of the financial challenges faced by small farmers by creating job opportunities and stimulating local economies. The expansion of commercial farming could also lead to a more diversified agricultural sector, with greater potential for export, which would enhance food security for the nation.
The tax revenue potential from corporate farming cannot be overlooked either. Under the stipulations of the International Monetary Fund (IMF), provincial governments are now required to tax agricultural incomes. As corporate farming grows, it is likely to generate substantial tax revenue, helping to fund critical infrastructure and development projects. Though provincial governments have been slow to introduce legislation to tax agricultural incomes, pressure from the IMF and the growing economic benefits of corporate farming could eventually push them to make necessary reforms.
Despite the potential benefits of corporate farming, there are legitimate concerns about the impact it could have on small farmers and rural communities. One of the primary fears is that corporate farms could further displace smaller landholders, particularly in a country where land ownership is already skewed in favor of the elite. If large corporations gain control of significant swaths of agricultural land, it could lead to the displacement of many small-scale farmers who lack the resources to compete with corporate entities.
There are also concerns about the predatory practices that may emerge as corporations consolidate agricultural power. In countries like India, large corporate farming ventures have been associated with land grabs, exploitation of workers, and the marginalization of small farmers. These practices have sparked protests and legal challenges, as communities fight to protect their land and livelihoods from corporate encroachment.
Pl watch the video and subscribe to the YouTube channel of republicpolicy.com for quality podcasts:
To avoid such negative outcomes, the Pakistani government must take a careful, balanced approach to corporate farming. The introduction of well-crafted regulations that protect small farmers’ rights, ensure fair land allocation, and prevent exploitative practices will be crucial. Transparent land leasing processes, protection of local communities, and the enforcement of labor rights will be essential to prevent corporate farming from becoming a tool for further exploitation.
Rather than rejecting corporate farming outright, Pakistan should aim for a more nuanced approach that incorporates the benefits of modern farming while safeguarding the interests of small-scale farmers. This could involve creating regulatory frameworks that balance the interests of both corporate and small-scale farmers, ensuring that the benefits of agricultural growth are shared broadly across communities.
One of the first steps toward achieving this balance is investing in land reforms. Pakistan needs to address the concentration of landholdings in the hands of a few powerful elites and ensure that smaller farmers have access to land and resources. This can help level the playing field, enabling small farmers to compete more effectively with corporate farms and adopt modern technologies that will improve productivity.
Additionally, the government should promote educational programs that equip farmers with the knowledge and skills needed to adopt modern farming practices. Access to financial resources, such as affordable loans for small farmers, will also be crucial in helping them transition to more efficient and sustainable farming methods.
Lastly, the government must ensure that the economic benefits of corporate farming are shared equitably with local communities. This could include job creation, improved infrastructure, and access to advanced farming techniques. Corporate farms should be incentivized to invest in their local communities, offering training programs and creating opportunities for small farmers to become suppliers or partners in the agricultural value chain.
Conclusion
The shift toward corporate farming in Pakistan is a complex and contentious issue. While there are significant potential benefits, including increased agricultural productivity, improved food security, and enhanced tax revenues, the risks to small farmers and rural communities cannot be ignored. A balanced approach that incorporates modern farming practices while protecting the interests of smaller farmers is essential to ensuring that Pakistan’s agricultural sector can thrive without exacerbating inequalities. With careful regulation and thoughtful implementation, corporate farming could play a key role in revitalizing Pakistan’s agricultural sector and securing a more sustainable future for the country’s farmers.