Ahmed Hasan Cheema
The interim government led by Prime Minister Anwaar-ul-Haq Kakar seems intent on shaping the economic future of Pakistan, even after its term ends. Recent pronouncements by the Prime Minister and the formation of advisory councils like the Industrial Advisory Council suggest a desire to set a long-term economic agenda for the next elected government. This raises crucial questions about the legitimacy and effectiveness of such attempts.
Industry-centric Priorities and Lack of Transparency:
The Industrial Advisory Council’s composition raises concerns about its representativeness. Dominated by representatives of large, established industries like textiles, automobiles, and fertilizers, it overlooks the vast majority of small and medium enterprises (SMEs) that contribute significantly to the economy. This lack of inclusivity suggests that the proposed policies might benefit specific industries at the expense of others.
Furthermore, the interim government’s economic agenda remains shrouded in obscurity. While promoting vague notions of an “economic blueprint,” concrete details and strategies are missing. This lack of transparency fuels doubts about the motives and potential biases behind the proposed policies.
Please, subscribe to the monthly magazines of republicpolicy.com
Conflicting Agendas and Democratic Principles:
The interim government, appointed to oversee a fair and impartial election process, may be overstepping its bounds by dictating economic policies for the future government. Each political party likely has its own vision and agenda for economic development, and imposing a pre-determined roadmap upon them restricts their ability to make informed decisions based on their own electoral promises and assessments.
This approach undermines democratic principles and potentially stifles the next government’s ability to effectively address the country’s economic challenges. Additionally, the short-term lifespan of the interim government makes it ill-equipped to formulate long-term policies that require sustained commitment and oversight.
Focus on Immediate Concerns and Inclusive Policymaking:
Instead of attempting to set a comprehensive and potentially restrictive economic agenda, the interim government would be better served by focusing on immediate concerns like managing the existing IMF program, ensuring fiscal stability, and creating a conducive environment for free and fair elections.
Furthermore, it is crucial to involve a broader spectrum of stakeholders in future policymaking. This includes representatives from underrepresented sectors like SMEs, as well as experts from diverse fields like academia and civil society. Only by incorporating diverse perspectives and ensuring transparency can the government develop effective and sustainable economic solutions that benefit the entire nation.
Lastly, the interim government’s efforts to craft a long-term economic agenda appear premature and potentially detrimental to the country’s democratic process. By exceeding its mandate and focusing on immediate concerns while prioritizing inclusivity in future policymaking, the interim government can better serve its purpose and pave the way for a more stable and prosperous future for Pakistan.
Please, subscribe to the YouTube channel of republicpoolicy.com
