Arshad Mahmood Awan
Pakistan, despite contributing less than 1% of global greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, finds itself grappling with the severe impacts of climate change. Ranked 5th among the world’s most climate-vulnerable nations, the country is experiencing rising temperatures, erratic weather patterns, and increasing economic losses. The 2022 floods alone caused damages amounting to a staggering $40 billion, underscoring the urgency of addressing climate change. In response to this crisis, Pakistan has taken a significant step by launching the Pakistan Green Taxonomy 2025, an initiative developed by the State Bank of Pakistan (SBP), in collaboration with the Ministry of Climate Change and Environmental Coordination (MoCC&EC) and with technical assistance from the World Bank. The initiative aims to mobilize $348 billion by 2030, directing investments into projects that support climate resilience and align with both national climate policies and the Paris Agreement.
At its core, the Pakistan Green Taxonomy 2025 is a comprehensive classification system designed to guide investments into genuinely sustainable activities. It defines a set of environmental objectives such as climate change mitigation, adaptation strategies, pollution control, promoting a circular economy, and ensuring sustainable land and water management. This classification system extends across key sectors including energy, manufacturing, transportation, construction, agriculture, information and communication technology (ICT), and waste management, ensuring that investments are channeled toward activities that contribute to sustainability goals.
The taxonomy categorizes activities based on their environmental impact, using a “traffic light” system. Activities are classified as “green” (fully sustainable), “amber” (transitioning), or “red” (unsustainable and ineligible for green finance). Additionally, it incorporates “Do No Significant Harm” (DNSH) safeguards, ensuring that projects that claim to be green do not cause significant negative environmental impacts.
One of the greatest strengths of this initiative is its potential to bring transparency and standardization to Pakistan’s green finance sector. By providing clear definitions of what constitutes a green investment, it helps to avoid greenwashing—a common issue in the sustainability sector, where companies or institutions falsely claim to be eco-friendly. The Green Taxonomy sets a clear framework, offering confidence to investors that their funds will go toward genuine sustainability initiatives.
Moreover, the taxonomy aligns with international frameworks such as the EU Green Taxonomy and the ASEAN Green Taxonomy, which could help Pakistan attract international green investments. The alignment with global standards can enhance the credibility of Pakistan’s green financial system and potentially attract climate-focused foreign direct investment (FDI), green bonds, and other sustainable funding sources. This could be a key driver in mobilizing the necessary funds to build climate resilience and address the mounting challenges posed by climate change.
However, the path to achieving the goals set out by the Green Taxonomy is not without significant challenges. One of the most pressing concerns is implementation. Pakistan has a history of struggling with policy enforcement and inter-agency coordination. Without robust monitoring mechanisms and a commitment to strong governance, there is a risk that the Green Taxonomy could become another well-intentioned policy without real-world impact. Past experiences with policy rollouts suggest that execution will be critical in ensuring the success of this initiative.
Another challenge is the lack of a robust green finance ecosystem in Pakistan. Financial institutions, investors, and banks have limited experience with green finance, and there is a need for significant structural change to facilitate the transition. Shifting investment away from high-emission industries, such as fossil fuels and manufacturing, will require strong incentives, regulatory mandates, and risk-mitigation measures. Without these, there is a risk that businesses will be unwilling to embrace sustainable practices, particularly in sectors like cement, steel, and textiles, which are essential to Pakistan’s economy but are also major carbon emitters.
Transitioning major industries, which are central to Pakistan’s economy, presents another significant hurdle. Sectors like cement, steel, textiles, and agriculture are heavy carbon emitters, but they also employ millions and contribute significantly to the national GDP. The Green Taxonomy acknowledges the need for “transition activities” to decarbonize these sectors. However, it does not provide a clear roadmap for how these industries will achieve sustainability without significant economic disruption. Transitioning these sectors will require substantial financial support, such as subsidies, concessional loans, and blended finance models, which would make the transition more affordable for businesses and prevent capital flight or job losses. Without these targeted financial interventions, industries may struggle to adapt, risking economic instability.
Pl subscribe to the YouTube channel of republicpolicy.com for quality podcasts:
Furthermore, the Green Taxonomy needs to promote financial mechanisms that foster innovation in renewable energy, waste management, and water conservation. The availability of affordable green technologies is essential to encourage businesses to adopt sustainable practices. Without accessible and cost-effective green technologies, industries may find it difficult to invest in green solutions, undermining the effectiveness of the taxonomy.
The private sector plays a critical role in ensuring the success of the Green Taxonomy. While the document has been developed with input from government ministries, regulators, and financial institutions, business buy-in has been limited so far. To ensure broad adoption, it is essential to provide clear incentives for the private sector to integrate the taxonomy into their investment and risk strategies. Public awareness campaigns, training programs, and capacity-building efforts will be crucial to help businesses understand the taxonomy’s goals and incorporate them into their operations.
Additionally, provincial coordination will be vital for the effective implementation of the Green Taxonomy. Climate policy is often not a federal priority in Pakistan, and without coordination at the provincial level, there could be significant gaps in the implementation of the taxonomy. This would lead to inconsistencies in how policies are applied and reduce their effectiveness in achieving national climate goals.
In conclusion, the Pakistan Green Taxonomy 2025 represents a significant and much-needed step toward a sustainable future for Pakistan’s financial system. Its focus on transparency, standardization, and aligning with global frameworks offers a strong foundation for attracting green investments and creating climate-resilient infrastructure. However, its success will ultimately depend on how well it is implemented and whether the government, financial institutions, and the private sector can work together to overcome the challenges it faces.
For the Green Taxonomy to be truly transformative, it will need strong governance, enforcement, and private sector engagement. If executed effectively, it has the potential to reshape Pakistan’s economy, create green jobs, and attract sustainable investments, positioning Pakistan as a leader in regional sustainable finance. On the other hand, without strong execution, it risks becoming just another well-meaning policy that fails to live up to its potential, leaving Pakistan vulnerable to the ongoing climate crisis. The future of Pakistan’s economy and its ability to build climate resilience hinges on how effectively the Green Taxonomy is put into practice.
