Arshad Mahmood Awan
When anti-Assad militants entered Damascus triumphantly last December, there were widespread fears that the country would descend into sectarian and religious violence. At that time, Ahmad al-Sharaa, the then-rebel leader and now interim President of Syria, reassured the world that there would be no place for such bloodshed in the new Syria. However, recent events have shown just how fragile that promise was, as the country has been rocked by a horrific spasm of violence over the past few days, exposing the deep divisions and challenges that remain in the post-Assad era.
Initial reports last week pointed to clashes between Assad loyalists and opposition forces in Syria’s coastal Alawi heartland. However, the situation has escalated into something far more chilling. Reports from a UK-based war monitor indicate that nearly 1,000 civilians have been killed in the violence, the majority of them from the Alawi sect, to which Bashar al-Assad belongs. Eyewitness accounts describe gruesome scenes of Alawi families being massacred, their homes ransacked, and their possessions looted. In some instances, children were killed by pro-government militants, and witnesses claim that the attackers repeatedly shouted that they would finish off the Alawi community. There are even reports suggesting that foreign fighters, including Chechens and Uzbeks, were involved in the brutal rampage. It wasn’t until the Syrian government intervened by sending in troops that the violence finally began to subside.
This wave of bloodshed has exposed the deep and persistent fault lines in Syria’s society. The hopes of a peaceful and stable Syria seem increasingly distant as sectarian violence threatens to become a defining characteristic of the country’s future. Although the fall of Bashar al-Assad’s brutal regime has been celebrated by many, it is clear that Syria is far from achieving the peace and stability it desperately needs. The promise of a new democratic Syria seems increasingly out of reach, especially when religious militancy and sectarian conflict remain deeply ingrained in the country’s political and social fabric.
Ahmad al-Sharaa, once known for his extreme jihadi rhetoric under the name Abu Mohammad al-Jolani, had promised a shift toward moderation. However, the reality on the ground suggests that his promise is being severely tested. While al-Sharaa has sought to present himself as a figure who can unite the country and usher in a new era of governance, many militant factions with deeply entrenched ideologies remain active in Syria. Some of these groups, which were once part of the anti-Assad resistance, now occupy positions of power within the new Syrian administration. The question remains: can Sharaa control these factions and prevent Syria from becoming a haven for extremists?
Pl watch the video and subscribe to the YouTube channel of republicpolicy.com for quality podcasts:
Foreign fighters, many of whom came to Syria to support the opposition during the civil war, have also gained influence within the country. These individuals, including fighters from countries such as Chechnya and Uzbekistan, have been implicated in the recent massacres. The continued presence of foreign militants poses a serious challenge to Syria’s sovereignty and stability. Many of these foreign fighters were instrumental in Sharaa’s rise to power, and as such, their influence in the country remains a key issue that must be addressed if Syria is to move beyond its history of violence and sectarianism.
Another critical issue complicating Syria’s transition to stability is the presence of foreign forces, particularly Israel, which has expanded its occupation of Syrian territory in recent years. For Syria to rebuild and recover from the devastation of its long-standing civil war, it is essential that all foreign powers cease their interventionist activities. However, this is easier said than done. Syria’s political landscape remains fractured, and foreign involvement continues to be a significant factor in shaping the country’s future. The international community must play a role in ensuring that foreign forces respect Syria’s sovereignty and territorial integrity, allowing the country the space it needs to rebuild.
Equally important is the need for the Syrian government to disarm or expel the sectarian and extremist groups that continue to operate within its borders. While many of these groups were crucial in the struggle against the Assad regime, they have now become a destabilizing force within Syria itself. Sharaa’s administration must take immediate and decisive action to curb the influence of these factions if the country is to avoid further bloodshed and violence. The challenge is monumental, as many of these groups have fought alongside Sharaa’s forces, and they have been promised a role in Syria’s future political and military landscape. However, allowing these factions to continue operating unchecked will only serve to fuel more violence and instability.
The recent sectarian massacres are a grim reminder of the deep divisions that continue to define Syrian society. The Alawi community, which has been the target of much of the recent violence, has long been associated with the Assad regime. However, the violence against them raises troubling questions about the future of Syria’s religious and ethnic minorities. The recent killings, while targeting the Alawi community, are indicative of a broader pattern of sectarian violence that could engulf other minority groups as well. Syria’s future stability will depend on the ability of its leaders to address these divisions and foster an environment of tolerance and coexistence.
For Ahmad al-Sharaa and his administration, the next steps are critical. The interim leader has promised accountability for the recent massacres, but he must move quickly if Syria is to avoid further descent into sectarian violence. He must also demonstrate that he can control the militias and extremist groups that continue to operate within the country. Sharaa’s promise of moderation and unity will ring hollow if he is unable to rein in the forces of extremism that have plagued Syria for so long. His leadership will be tested in the coming months as he navigates the complex and volatile political landscape of a post-Assad Syria.
The international community has a role to play in supporting Syria’s transition to peace, but ultimately, the responsibility lies with the Syrian leadership. For the country to move forward, there must be a concerted effort to address the root causes of sectarian violence, disarm extremist groups, and build a government that is inclusive of all Syrians, regardless of their religious or ethnic background. The road ahead will be difficult, but it is not impossible. If Syria is to rebuild and achieve lasting peace, it must start with an end to the violence and a commitment to justice and reconciliation.
In conclusion, Syria is at a perilous crossroads. The promise of a peaceful and democratic Syria is being tested by the realities of sectarian conflict, foreign intervention, and the persistence of extremist militias. While the fall of Assad has removed one of the main obstacles to peace, the country’s future remains uncertain. Ahmad al-Sharaa and his government must act swiftly to prevent further bloodshed and work toward a future that embraces unity, stability, and peace for all Syrians. The recent massacres serve as a chilling reminder that the path to peace in Syria will be long and fraught with challenges.
