Samina Ali Zaidi
In a recent example of government overreach, the education department of Azad Kashmir has mandated the wearing of hijab for both students and teachers in co-education schools. The rule will be stringently enforced and schools that do not comply will be penalized. The dissemination of the notification on social media sparked criticism over the imposition of the hijab. It is appalling that instead of improving education quality and addressing its deficiencies, the AJK government is focusing on dictating women’s choices. Irrespective of the number of women who wear the hijab in AJK, it is not within the government’s purview to enforce such a law. Donning a veil is a personal choice, one that women make after careful consideration. The government’s decision to impose this on them exhibits its bias towards moral policing. Similarly, in India, states that have banned veils are also culpable of overreaching on an issue that is purely personal.
It is absurd that the AJK authorities have taken it upon themselves to mandate the wearing of hijab. This is a blatant example of state coercion and a grave infringement on personal freedom. Instead of meddling in personal affairs, the government should focus on addressing pressing issues in education, such as lack of resources and poor infrastructure. It is hypocritical that the same government that cannot provide adequate education to its people is focused on enforcing dress codes. Such a decision reflects a lack of priorities and incompetence in governance.
The notion that the government can dictate what women should wear is archaic and misogynistic. Women are capable of making their own choices and should not be subject to the state’s moral policing. The imposition of the hijab is not only an assault on personal freedom but also an affront to the principles of gender equality. The government’s decision is a regressive step that has no place in a modern, progressive society.
It is both ironic and appalling that in both the AJK and Indian scenarios, women are the targets of state-enforced personal restrictions and bans. It is rare to see such draconian measures being taken against men. Women are often subjected to such actions, with the state using everything from religion to security to justify its actions.
The time has come to end this constant policing of women and allow them to decide for themselves whether or not to wear the hijab. To deprive them of this agency is to give the state license to police its citizens in other areas as well. Despite having higher literacy rates than most regions in Pakistan, the quality of education in AJK remains subpar. Over 20% of fifth-grade students in AJK cannot read a simple story in Urdu, and many struggle with basic mathematics. The education department would do well to focus on addressing these issues rather than enforcing oppressive dress codes.
The decision to mandate the hijab is not only a violation of personal freedom, but it is also a blatant display of patriarchal oppression. Women should be able to make their own choices without interference from the state. It is disheartening to see that the government is more concerned with controlling women’s clothing choices than with addressing pressing issues in education. Such actions only serve to perpetuate the systemic oppression of women.
The imposition of the hijab is not the solution to the challenges facing education in AJK. The government should prioritize resources, infrastructure, and teacher training to improve the quality of education. It is imperative that the education department focus on providing quality education to all students, regardless of their gender or socioeconomic status. The government must recognize that education is the key to progress and development, and it should be a top priority.
It is also important to note that the enforcement of the hijab is not only a violation of personal freedom, but it is also a violation of religious freedom. While wearing the hijab is a personal choice for some, it is not a requirement in Islam. The government should not be in the business of dictating how individuals practice their faith.
It is time for the government to focus on issues that truly matter, such as education, healthcare, and poverty reduction. These issues affect all citizens, regardless of their gender or religious beliefs. The government’s priorities should reflect the needs of the people, not the whims of the state.
The state’s obsession with controlling women’s bodies and choices is not limited to dress codes. Women’s reproductive rights have also come under attack in recent years, with some states imposing restrictions on abortion and birth control. These actions are a violation of women’s bodily autonomy and their right to make decisions about their own bodies.
Women’s rights are human rights, and they should not be subject to the whims of the state or society. The government must work to create a society that values and respects women’s autonomy and agency. This includes addressing systemic issues such as gender-based violence, gender pay gaps, and discrimination.
In conclusion, the government’s decision to mandate the wearing of hijab in AJK is not only a violation of personal freedom, but it is also a display of patriarchal oppression. Women should be free to make their own choices without interference from the state. The government should prioritize resources and efforts towards improving education, healthcare, and poverty reduction. These issues affect all citizens, and the government’s priorities should reflect the needs of the people. It is time for the government to end its obsession with controlling women’s bodies and choices and start working towards creating a more equitable and just society for all.
Read more: