Editorial
Pakistan, burdened with severe water inefficiencies and chronic food insecurity, is at a crossroads. The government’s response has been the Cholistan Project and the broader Green Pakistan initiative, which are touted as groundbreaking steps toward agricultural transformation and food security. These projects combine large-scale afforestation with corporate farming efforts, aiming to solve the country’s pressing environmental and food challenges. However, while they are presented as ambitious solutions, the lack of clarity and transparency raises concerns about their true potential to address underlying issues.
At its core, the Cholistan Project proposes to boost productivity and efficiency on barren land through corporate farming and modern technology, with hopes of replicating this model across the country’s inefficient farmlands. On the surface, it sounds promising. But such initiatives often gain traction when policymakers are unwilling to confront more difficult but necessary reforms within Pakistan’s agriculture sector.
Pl subscribe to the YouTube channel of republicpolicy.com
The country’s agriculture and water management have long been plagued by three key failures: policy paralysis, inequitable resource distribution, and a culture of opacity. Pakistan’s water usage is among the most inefficient in the world, due to outdated canal systems, unchecked groundwater extraction, and a lack of conservation pricing. Instead of addressing these systemic issues, the government has opted for shortcuts, such as state-run corporate farming on wastelands, without engaging with the politically challenging task of reforming entrenched agricultural practices.
This approach substitutes spectacle for substance, avoiding real reform. While supporters argue that experimentation is needed in the face of political inertia, large-scale failures often reinforce public skepticism and protect vested interests from future reforms. Furthermore, the project risks deepening inequity, especially for marginalized farmers in regions like Sindh and southern Punjab, who already suffer from poor water distribution.
For Pakistan to truly tackle its water and food crises, it must prioritize transparent, evidence-based reforms, equitable distribution of resources, and a genuine commitment to sustainable practices. Without these, the Cholistan Project, like other grand initiatives before it, will likely falter, further eroding public trust and delaying necessary change.
